View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Timeline of Episcopal split

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

March 2006: Episcopal Diocese of Colorado begins financial investigation of the Rev. Donald Armstrong after receiving a complaint of possible financial misconduct.

Dec. 27: Armstrong begins 90-day suspension.

March 26, 2007: Diocese releases financial misconduct allegations against Armstrong. On the same day, Grace Church's vestry votes to leave the Episcopal Church to join the Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA).

April 1: Grace and St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, led by the Rev. Michael O'Donnell, holds first service.

April 6: Grace CANA files lawsuit against diocese to keep church property at 601 N. Tejon St.

April 14: Armstrong declares his innocence to parish.

April 22: Grace Episcopal Church holds first service at First Christian Church.

May 10: Diocese files counterclaim against Grace CANA to evict the breakaway parish from North Tejon Street property.

May 26: Ninety-three percent of Armstrong's parish vote to join CANA, according to Grace CANA's records.

July 16: Police begin criminal investigation of Armstrong.

Sept. 26: Ecclesiastical court convicts Armstrong of financial misconduct.

Oct. 5: The Rev. Michael O'Donnell is officially appointed priest-in-charge of Grace Episcopal by diocese Bishop Robert O'Neill.

Oct. 23: Independent forensic audit, arranged by Armstrong's attorneys, finds no theft or tax fraud. Diocese is not swayed by the audit. Vestry of Grace Episcopal issues statement contesting the audit's legitimacy.

Oct. 31: Diocese deposes Armstrong.


See archived 'Local' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site