View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
R. SCOTT RAPPOLD
The north side of Hoosier Pass, in the shadow of fourteener Quandary Peak, is seeing increased development.
Proposed land purchase, Blue River

Most Commented Stories

Most Recommended Stories

Poll

Colorado Springs Utilities land purchase
Is $240,000 to buy 1.6 acres in Summit County to keep it natural, for pipeline protection, a good use of rate-payer money?
No
Yes
Yes, but only if rate-payers can crash there when we go skiing
Enter The Code To Vote
 
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Springs Utilities buying Summit County real estate - to keep it natural

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Says residential development threatens 56-year-old water pipeline

THE GAZETTE

Colorado Springs Utilities is getting into the high-priced world of Summit County real estate, not to build anything, but to prevent it.

The city-owned utility will ask City Council on Tuesday for approval to buy three parcels, 1.6 acres in a growing area near Hoosier Pass, for $240,000, to keep residential development from encroaching on its oldest trans-mountain water line, the Blue River System.

About 10 percent of Colorado Springs’ water is diverted from the Blue River watershed and under the Continental Divide at Hoosier Pass. The system began delivering water in 1953. Utilities doesn’t own the land, but easements along the pipeline’s path.

In recent years, Utilities officials have grown concerned about development near the water system. The area is 10 miles south of Breckenridge, a booming ski-resort town, and houses and mountain subdivisions now abound in this once-rural area.

Colorado Springs Mayor Lionel Rivera in 2007 wrote a letter to Summit County commissioners, expressing concern development in the Quandary Village area could damage the pipeline and cause slope instability in the narrow mountain valley. He also asked commissioners to write new regulations to address the issues and work with Utilities on approving developments.

Two-and-a-half years later, Utilities officials now work with Summit County to review new developments, but their concerns remain. They decided buying three lots was their only option, because they determined septic systems on those properties could potentially leak into the pipeline.

“There was potential development taking place above that slope. That creates a variety of concerns when you have development directly above your pipeline and your infrastructure,” said Utilities spokesman Steve Berry.

Utilities wants to buy the land and leave it undeveloped, and has a willing seller. The three parcels were appraised at $270,000, Utilities wrote in a memo to the council. A search of real estate Web sites shows that, while homes in Quandary Village are selling in the $700,000 to $900,000 range, while half-acre vacant lots are going for up to $240,000.

Berry acknowledged that buying expensive mountain real estate is not ideal for a utility struggling with rising costs and about to embark on a major expansion of its water network, the $1.4 billion Southern Delivery System.

“The alternative would be twice as costly,” Berry said. “In the grand scheme of things, yeah, you’d like to avoid that situation but if you have to do it, there’s nothing more important than preserving the integrity of those pipes and that water.”

This is a “fairly unique situation,” he said, because in most cases, Utilities buys easements, rather than land, for its pipelines. He was not aware of another time in the recent history of the system Utilities bought land to keep development away from facilities.


See archived 'Top Stories' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
How bad was The Who?
What did you think of The Who's halftime show?
Embarrassing
OK, considering their age
Time to move on from classic rockers
They rocked!
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site