View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Proposed gravel pit presents test for Fountain Creek board

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

THE GAZETTE

A new agency that was created to oversee Fountain Creek after more than two years of study, planning and negotiation, already has a hot potato on its hands.

Lafarge West, Inc., wants to dig a gravel pit between Fountain Creek and Interstate 25 south of Pikes Peak International Raceway, and it needs the new board's approval to do it.

The project, which would bring dust, noise and nearly 800 trucks a day, could become a lightning rod that will test the new nine-member Fountain Creek Watershed Flood Control and Greenway District board.

Board chairman, El Paso County Commissioner Dennis Hisey, said the board will apply tough standards to protect the creek from the mining operation.

"We'll have certain assurances that things are going to be done right," he said.

But Ferris Frost is skeptical a gravel pit could ever be compatible with the creek.

A rancher whose family donated a 915-acre conservation easement opposite the gravel pit site, Frost is concerned about sediment washing downstream, damage from flooding to wetlands and riparian areas, noise, dust and traffic.

"We don't consider it possible," said Frost, who worked on the vision task force. "I should hope the district wouldn't allow it. It's so counter to what the watershed is about."

The watershed board consists of representatives from El Paso and Pueblo counties and other entities within the watershed, which covers 927 square miles and includes 27 drainage basins from Palmer Lake to Pueblo.

The district evolved from the Fountain Creek Vision Task Force, a multi-jurisdictional group launched in 2006 that drew plans for improving and protecting the creek's water quality while creating wildlife havens and a recreation corridor.

Lafarge wants to build an asphalt and concrete plant and a gravel extraction operation on 514 acres next to the creek. The plant would run for 12 hours a day, seven days a week for 15 years, depending on demand, according to Lafarge's proposal.

The company plans interchange improvements and a new road east of I-25 to handle the estimated 780 truck going to and from the site.

Lafarge's proposal gives detailed prescription for reclaiming the land, including replacement of topsoil, seeding and mowing.

Lafarge, which has 20 to 30 mining operations in Colorado, has a good track record, said Lafarge spokesman Sean Frisch. "We do a complete job until the reclamation as required is finished," he said.

The district board has the final say on approving mining within the 100-year floodplain, although the part of the proposed gravel pit outside the floodplain would also have to be approved by the county commissioners.

A hearing on the Lafarge proposal will be held at the next district board meeting at 10 a.m. May 29 at Fountain City Hall.
-
Call Zubeck at 636-0238


See archived 'Top Stories' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site