View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Proposal would raise marriage fee

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Money would help program for kids

THE GAZETTE

   Saying "I do" could get more expensive in Colorado.

 

   Sen. John Morse, D-Colorado Springs, has proposed raising the marriage fee from $10 to $35 to raise money for Court-Appointed Special Advocate programs across the state. SB 47 could come up for a final vote in the Senate as soon as today.

 

   CASA programs pair volunteers with children who are going through neglect or abuse cases or sometimes divorce proceedings.

 

   They get some local government funding but no state money, leaving thousands of children across the state stuck on a waiting list.

 

   Morse said Colorado has the second lowest marriage fee in the country, and he thinks it's an appropriate source of funding for CASA because the agency deals with the problems of broken homes.

 

   Senate Republicans who agree with Morse's goal say they're shocked, however, that he would pay for it by increasing the marriage fee.

 

   Sen. Dave Schultheis, R-Colorado Springs, argued the state should do everything it can to promote marriage and should consider adding the fee to the cost of getting a divorce instead.

 

   CONTACT THE WRITER: (303) 837-0613 or ed.sealover@gazette.com


See archived 'Local' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site