View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

UPDATE: Monument growth

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

THE GAZETTE

THE ISSUE: Three east Monument housing developments that could double the town’s population haven’t exploded as landowners expected because of a slowing housing market.

BACKGROUND: Monument officials approved Promontory Pointe, Sanctuary Pointe and Home Place Ranch in 2006, despite strong opposition from many neighbors. The developments are between Higby and Baptist roads.

Promontory Pointe plans still call for about 270 homes on 120 acres, and Sanctuary Pointe still calls for about 600 homes on 650 acres, developers said this week.

Home Place Ranch planned about 900 homes on 440 acres, but owner Mitchell Yellen did not return calls to The Gazette this week to say whether plans have changed.

THE LATEST: Promontory Pointe is the only development that’s started construction.

Crews have finished prepping 40 lots and plan to start building the first model home in two or three months, said John Bisset, senior vice president of finance for developer John Laing Homes. The first home should be ready in early 2009, he said.

Sanctuary Pointe developer Classic Homes can’t move forward until it and the town sign the annexation documents, said John Maynard of the engineering firm NES.

The town annexed the development in November 2006.

“Nobody’s really in a hurry in this market,” Maynard said.

The papers should be signed in a month; about six months later crews can start moving dirt, Maynard said. He didn’t have an estimate on when the first house could be built.

As for Home Place Ranch, the view from Higby Road shows no construction work in progress on the site.

JENNIFER WILSON, THE GAZETTE


See archived 'Local' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site