View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Rain in June falls short of forecast

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

THE GAZETTE

   Unless unexpected torrential downpours are on the way, it isn't likely July - the hottest month of the year - will be able to compensate for a thus far dismal year for precipitation in the Pikes Peak region.

   Forecasts that June would produce a normal amount of rain and compensate for an almost complete lack of rain in the first half of the year fell short by 1.82 inches. Half the month's 0.52 inches fell in a 24-hour period straddling June 19 and 20, according to the National Weather Service.

   "That is a nice soaking rain for one day, but over the course of the month if that's all you end up with, that is unfortunate," said Randy Gray, meteorological technician with the National Weather Service in Pueblo.

   Since January, the region has soaked up 2.86 inches, far below the normal 8.04 inches for midway through the year.

   The average daily high for June was 81.4 degrees, slightly above the average 79.2 degrees. The average daily low temperature was 50.4 degrees, near the normal 49.5 degrees.

   Looking ahead, meteorologists predict a fairly normal July, Gray said. Temperatures are not expected to deviate too far from the normal 84.4-degree average daily high and 54.8-degree average daily low.

   "There is a little bit of a hope for the month of July preciptiation-wise," Gray said.

   While the region is expected to collect at least the normal 2.85 inches of rain this month, a system stretching from New Mexico over the central Colorado mountains might sprinkle some additional moisture on the mountains hugging the Front Range.

   The record high for July was recorded at 100 degrees July 13, 1954, and again July 24, 2003. The record low is 37 degrees, set on July 4, 1903.


See archived 'Local' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site