View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Another slow month predicted for auto industry

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

DETROIT - Auto analysts forecast another slow month for the industry in October, with Ford Motor Co. falling hardest as it cuts sales to rentalcar fleets.

Erich Merkle, vice president of auto industry forecasting for consulting company IRN Inc. in Grand Rapids, said sales will probably be soft through the rest of the year because of the weak economy and anxious consumers. Automakers report October sales Thursday.

Merkle’s dim view was echoed throughout the industry. On Wednesday, AutoNation Inc., the nation’s largest automotive retailer, said its thirdquarter profit tumbled 12 percent. AutoNation Chairman and Chief Executive Mike Jackson said he expected auto sales will be hurt by confidence-sapping weakness in the housing market well into 2008 despite tight management of expenses and inventory.

“Exactly when consumer confidence will come back that we see a stabilization in auto sales, it’s very difficult to say,” Jackson told The Associated Press. “Most likely sometime next year.”

Merkle predicted an annualized sales rate of 16 million vehicles for October. The annualized rate shows what sales would be if they continued at the same pace for a year. The rate in September was 16.2 million, according to Autodata Corp. The rate peaked at 17.3 million in 2000.

The auto research site Edmunds.com expects 2.4 percent sales growth for October versus a year ago. Edmunds said Japanese automakers and General Motors Corp. could buck the trend because of hot-selling new vehicles, including the redesigned Honda Accord and Cadillac CTS sedans.

An October decline would mark a year since Ford has seen a monthly sales increase, according to Ward’s AutoInfoBank.

Toyota Motor Corp. is on track to replace Ford as the No. 2 automaker after GM in the U.S. market, based on sales in the first nine months this year. Edmunds.com economist Jesse Toprak predicts Ford’s sales will drop 16 percent in October, while Toyota sales will rise.

Ford is ready to take the hit. It wants to reduce sales to rental-car agencies because they can hurt brand image and resale values. In September 2006, for example, Ford sold nearly 23,000 of its old Taurus models to fleets. This year, Ford is no longer selling the old Taurus, and its new Taurus can’t make up the lost volume. Ford sold 4,230 new Taurus sedans this past September, according to Autodata.

“I don’t think anyone would ever expect them to get up to 22,000 per month on the new Taurus, because it isn’t the darling of rental companies,” Merkle said.

Merkle also said the new Taurus has a sedate design that isn’t firing up consumers.

“It’s a left-brain purchase. That’s the problem. Toyota and Honda will beat you on the left side of the brain each and every time,” Merkle said. “It’s got to become a right-brain purchase. It’s got to become more emotional.”

Ford President and Chief Executive Alan Mulally pushed to revive the Taurus name on what used to be the Five Hundred. Although sales of the new Taurus were slow in its first few months in showrooms, Mulally said Ford is just starting to market the revamped car.

“It’s not over yet,” he said. “This is a big change. We’re the ones that stopped it. Now we’re trying to start it again, and it’s going to be a little difficult.”

The Taurus became the best-selling car in America in 1992 with sales of nearly 410,000, unseating the Honda Accord just as Japanese imports were starting to take hold in the United States. It held the top spot for five straight years until it was supplanted by the Toyota Camry in 1997. Ford stopped making the Taurus in October 2006 until Mulally brought the name back.

Mulally called the new Taurus “fabulous,” but he said the next generation of the Taurus is the vehicle to watch.

“They’re just eye-watering,” he said. “I would have given anything if we would have done that, like, first. But again, we are where we are. The plan is consistency of purpose. Every one of these cars in each segment, improve them year after year, add a couple of new models in there and give the customers what they want.”


See archived 'Business' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site