View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size

Most Commented Stories

Most Recommended Stories

Poll

Colorado Springs is considering a range of tax and fee increases
What would you tell the city?
Go fly a kite -- I pay enough to the government.
I'm willing to do my part, even if it means paying a little more
The city should find ways to cut spending instead of increase taxes
Anti-tax conservatives are killing our community. These are visionary proposals.
These proposals don't go far enough.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

17 proposals for tax and fee hikes headed to City Council

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Increases target smokers, workers, cell phone users, auto owners

THE GAZETTE

Smokers, cell phone users, property and automobile owners, and people who work in Colorado Springs might help the city out of its financial pickle in the future.

A group studying ways for the cash-strapped city government to generate more money has identified 17 potential sources of revenue that could affect a wide segment of the population.

The group is part of the larger Sustainable Funding Committee, which is expected to go before the City Council on July 27 to present the revenue-generating proposals and a host of other ideas to help the city solve its financial problems.

It will be up to council members to decide whether to put any of the proposals into action.

Most of the ideas for new revenue, such as a property tax rate increase that would raise millions of dollars annually and extending the city's sales tax to cigarettes, require voter approval.

But a few ideas, such as a $10 or $20 automobile registration fee and a $50 license fee for all businesses, could be implemented by the council without a vote of the people.

In addition to generating money, all the proposals -- and that's all they are at this point -- are likely to generate controversy.

They include:

* A so-called Head Tax of $5 a month per employee. The tax would raise nearly $12.7 million in 2010, according to estimates. Who would pay it -- the employee, the employer or a combination of both -- hasn't been determined. In Denver, such a tax is imposed on businesses operating in the city and "individuals who earn at least $500 in a month performing services in Denver," according to that city's website. The tax is also known as an occupational privilege tax.

* A $10-a-year or a $20-a-year automobile registration fee that would generate about $3.5 million and about $7 million, respectively. The proposal comes on the heels of the state raising registration fees for most cars and light trucks by $32.

* Extend the city's sales tax to cigarettes, which would raise $1.6 million in 2010. Like the proposed automobile registration fee, this proposal comes after the state adopted a new law forcing cigarette buyers to pay the state sales tax, adding 15 cents to the cost of a $5 pack of smokes.

* Extend the city's sales tax to cell phones, raising nearly $900,000 next year.

* Increase the city's property tax rate, called a mill levy. An increase of 1 mill would generate about $5 million, and increasing it by 5 mills would raise about $25 million.

* Implement an additional 1 percent or 2 percent special sales tax on alcohol, but only on alcohol purchased at stores. The 1 percent increase would raise $3.5 million in 2010, and a 2 percent increase would raise double the amount.

* Increase the automobile rental tax rate from 1 percent to 3 percent, raising $720,000 in 2010.

It's unclear whether the council will put any of the proposals requiring voter approval on the November ballot.

But one member of the Sustainable Funding Committee, former state Sen. Andy McElhany, said he is opposed to all the proposals, at least in the immediate future.

In a survey among members of the Sustainable Funding Committee's revenue committee, "I voted against all of them in the short-run on the theory that it's just very bad policy to raise taxes in a recession," McElhany said this morning.

 

Take our poll about the proposals, in the panel to the right.


See archived 'Top Stories' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Ted Haggard is starting new church at his Colorado Springs home.
What's your view?
Good for him. If God has called Haggard to return to ministry, he should obey.
Haggard should stay out of the ministry. He has too much baggage to lead a church.
I don't care what Haggard does, and I'm sick of hearing about him in the news.
Haggard and anyone crazy enough to attend his church deserve each other.
Haggard has a lot to offer as a pastor. Let's give him a chance.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site