View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
20th Century Fox
Australian actors Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman star in “Australia.” Jackman plays a cattle driver who helps Kidman's widow drive cattle across the outback.
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

REVIEW: Syrup drowns sweeping, campy ‘Australia'

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

THE GAZETTE

They just don't make movies like "Australia" anymore.

And we are all the better for it.

Confusing schmaltz for genuine emotion and aesthetics for legitimate art, "Australia" is what you get when the film projector overheats and the only thing that comes out is pure corn syrup.

"Australia" is set against the scenic backdrop of pre-World War II Down Under. Nicole Kidman plays Lady Sarah Ashley, an English aristocrat who inherits a sprawling cattle ranch after her entrepreneur husband is killed. Not knowing the first thing about how to run the massive enterprise, she makes a pact with a rough-and-tumble cattleman (Hugh Jackman) to protect her new property from a takeover by greedy cattle barons (including David Wenham who, if he had a long enough mustache, would certainly spend the film twirling it).

The expertise of Lady Ashley's beefcake drover (Jackman) is especially helpful when she must drive 2,000 head of cattle across hundreds of miles of the unforgiving Australian outback. It isn't long before the new widow finds her heart stirred by the hired help.

While acclimating to her new, feral home, Lady Ashley comes face to face with the Australian government's barbaric practice of kidnapping aboriginal children for the purpose of "breeding the black out of them." She looks on one such child, Nullah (Brandon Walters) as her own son. (The film is more of a love story between a mother and a child than a man and a woman.) But dodging the law turns to dodging bombs when Japanese forces, which a few months earlier launched a devastating attack on Pearl Harbor, raze the city of Darwin.

"Australia" was one of my most anticipated films of the year. I find director Baz Luhrmann's movies to be phantasmagoric masterpieces. "Strictly Ballroom" was a cheeky delight, "Romeo + Juliet" a frenetic roller coaster, and the Oscar-nominated "Moulin Rouge" a hyperkinetic orgasm of sound and color. But Luhrmann's lack of cinematic restraint, the very thing that makes his films so powerful and memorable, is also the thing that sinks his latest work.

"Australia" is a melodramatic soap opera, a sweeping, old-fashioned, unabashedly romantic, an anachronistic throwback to yesteryear with in-your-face, modern, liberal sensibilities. Luhrmann's camera soars over the breathtaking countryside like an IMAX spectacular, and composes stunning dreamlike sequences. Every image is crafted to make Jackman look heroic and Kidman angelic. But it's all too pretty. Interested in controlling every aspect of his sugary aesthetic, Luhrmann shoots each frame in a glowing soft light and paints over reality, enhancing something that's already beautiful - be they people or landscapes - with CGI.

All this might be forgiven if his corny, formulaic story were remotely compelling or believable. Luhrmann does not populate his film with characters, but rather broad, wildly overacting, cartoonish stereotypes. And he leads with so much comedy in the beginning that we cannot possibly take him seriously later. He spends so much of the film with his tongue firmly planted in his cheek that when he goes to get it out, he discovers it is stuck there.

Billed as another "Gone With the Wind," "Australia" is instead a gaudy, overlong mess. Patterned after outdated cinematic conventions, it tacks on righteous indignation about racism that rings false and is somehow meant to distract you from Luhrmann's overindulgent hubris.

AUSTRALIA

Cast: Nicole Kidman, Hugh Jackman
Director: Baz Luhrmann
Playing at: See ads for theaters and showtimes
Rated: PG-13 (for violence and mild sexual content)
Running time: 2 hours, 45 minutes

GRADE: D

 


See archived 'Entertainment' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site