View the Online Newspaper
Subscribe to the Newspaper

Welcome! Sign In Here.

Not a Member? Join Now! Forgot Password?

Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

OPINION: Utilities gives others' money

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Colorado Springs Utilities will continue its award-winning "philanthropic" program next year, despite layoffs and burdensome proposals for sharp rate increases that will only make life harder for people struggling to get by.

The city-owned utility plans to decrease its philanthropic budget by $25,000 in 2009, but that means it will still give away well in excess of $300,000. That's chicken feed, relative to Utilities' billion-dollar budget. But it remains indefensible for a city-owned monopoly which provides essential services that citizens must buy, to use any portion of ratepayer money for charity.

At least one member of the Colorado Springs City Council understands the absurdity of charging customers for water, sewer, electric and gas and spending portions of the proceeds for charities the ratepayers may or may not support.

"I don't think they should be doing it during these hard financial times," said Councilman Jerry Heimlicher.

He's right, but he might go one farther. They shouldn't be doing it ever. Profitable businesses and individuals should give to charity with reckless abandon. One cannot give away too much, if the giving is a choice. But Colorado Springs Utilities isn't a private business. It's a government-sponsored monopoly with involuntary customers who have no choice but to pay. To bill them, and spend some of the money on charity, is to redistribute their wealth. It's giving away other people's money, which isn't charitable at all. Let the customers give to the charities of their choice, and bill them only for water, waste water, electric and gas.

 


See archived 'Opinion' stories »
 


Reader Comments
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate Ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Harrison school district closer to pay for performance for teachers
Should teacher pay be based on performance?
Yes. Teachers should be rewarded for good work, and poor performers should be weeded out.
No. Pay for performance is just a back-door way of blaming teachers for other problems in the education system.
It depends on what "performance" means. It's good if there's a fair measurement of performance.
Undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site